The Basis For Crypto Anarchy

With Crypto Anarchy The Government Is Not Temporarily Destroyed But Permanently Forbidden And Permanently Unnecessary. It Is A Community Where The Threat Of Violence Is Impotent Because Violence Is Impossible, And Violence Is Impossible Because It’s Participants Cannot Be Linked To Their True Names Or Physical Locations.

The Same Ideals Can Be Applied When It Comes To Such Technologies Like Crypto Currencies As Along As It Remains Behind Several Layers Of Encrypted Algorithms. I Still Don’t Trust The Use Of  Crypto Currencies On Such Devices Like Smart Phones Or Tablets. Even If The Local Default Encryption Standard Is Applied. Transactions Can Still Be Tracked And Intercepted By Third Parties (i.e. The NSA, Private Contractors) Even If The Individual Programmers Install Further Encrypted Safeguards.

Encryption Is Freedom

Anarchy

Would the Empire create an Ebola outbreak?

Originally posted on On the Mark:

A report at Global Research tells us that a Liberian scientist, Dr. Cyril Broderick, is accusing the US of being responsible for the Ebola outbreak in Liberia.

Dr. Broderick wrote the following:

The US Department of Defense (DoD) is funding Ebola trials on humans, trials which started just weeks before the Ebola outbreak in Guinea and Sierra Leone. The reports continue and state that the DoD gave a contract worth $140 million dollars to Tekmira, a Canadian pharmaceutical company, to conduct Ebola research. This research work involved injecting and infusing healthy humans with the deadly Ebola virus. Hence, the DoD is listed as a collaborator in a “First in Human” Ebola clinical trial (NCT02041715, which started in January 2014 shortly before an Ebola epidemic was declared in West Africa in March.

It is certainly possible that the United States Department of Defense is behind this outbreak of Ebola, after all…

View original 606 more words

Lies Of The Regime

Often When I Contemplate The Lies Of Various Regimes Around The World, Both Now And In The Past, I Become Confused By How Badly All Those Lies Play Out. The Stories And Myths Seem Concocted By Middle School Kids Barely Paying Attention. Often The Lies Are Concocted To Lead A Country To War Against Some Innocent People, But Often The Lies Are Just Banal And Trivial.

u_s_s_r__flag_wallpaper_by_neozuki

As I Was Pondering The Lies Of The State, I Stumbled Over The Following Quote In My Travels Over The Internet. I Can’t Remember Where I Saw The Quote So Apologies To Whomever I Should Give Credit To.

“In My Study Of Communist Societies, I Came To The Conclusion That The Purpose Of Communist Propaganda Was Not To Persuade Or Convince, Not To Inform, But To Humiliate; And Therefore, The Less It Corresponded To Reality The Better. When People Are Forced To Remain Silent When They Are Being Told The Most Obvious Lies, Or Even Worse When They Are Forced To Repeat The Lies Themselves, They Lose Once And For All Their Sense Of Probity. To Assent To Obvious Lies Is…In Some Small Way To Become Evil Oneself. One’s Standing To Resist Anything Is Thus Eroded, And Even Destroyed. A Society Of Emasculated Liars Is Easy To Control. I Think If You Examine Political Correctness, It Has The Same Effect And Is Intended To.” ― Theodore Dalrymple

Please Remember That There Is Precious Little Real Difference Between The Communist System And The Crony Capitalist System (Or “Corporatist” As Mussolini Liked To Use) That Has Become The Standard In The World Today. All States Sooner Or Later Assume Dictatorial Control Over Their Subjects. (Yes, Subjects And Not Citizens) So This Theory Is That The State’s Lies Are Even Better If We Are Forced To Believe Them Even When They Are So Very Infantile And Unbelievable. This Fits In With Many Other Descriptions Of The State And Its Common Methods.

I Like The Comparison Between Mr. Dalrymple’s Ideas And Those Of George Orwell In The Quote By A High Party Official In 1984 That I Wrote About Some Time Ago. A Member Of The Inner Party Tells Winston Smith:

“The Party Seeks Power Entirely For Its Own Sake. We Are Not Interested In The Good Of Others; We Are Interested Solely In Power. We Are Different From All The Oligarchies Of The Past In That We Know What We Are Doing. All The Others Were Cowards And Hypocrites. They Never Had The Courage To Recognize Their Motives. We Know That No One Ever Seizes Power With The Intention Of Relinquishing It. Power Is Not A Means; It Is An End. The Object Of Persecution Is Persecution. The Object Of Torture Is Torture. The Object Of Power Is Power. How Does One Man Assert His Power Over Another? By Making Him Suffer. Unless He Is Suffering, How Can You Be Sure That He Is Obeying Your Will And Not His Own? Power Is In Inflicting Pain And Humiliation. Power Is In Tearing Human Minds To Pieces And Putting Them Together Again In New Shapes Of Your Own Choosing. In Our World, There Will Be No Emotions Except Fear, Rage, Triumph, And Self-Abasement – A World Of Fear And Treachery And Torment. If You Want A Picture Of The Future, Imagine A Boot Stamping On A Human Face Forever.” ~1984

In Both Quotes We See That The Ultimate Goal Of The State Is The Infliction Of Pain, Suffering, And Humiliation Upon The Unfortunate Subjugated People. The State Is Our Enemy As Albert Jay Nock Pointed Out To Us Long Ago. But It Is Not Just That The Power Mad Control Freaks Want Your Obedience, They Want You Utterly Humiliated And Enslaved. They Want You To Be Dehumanized.

Murray Rothbard Pointed Out In His Famous Essay Anatomy of the State That The State Is The “Organization Of The Political Means”; It Is The Systematization Of The Predatory Process Over A Given Territory. The State Seeks To Dominate, Subjugate, And Loot The Human Sheep They See As Existing For That Very Purpose.

Considering The Above, How Can Anyone Believe That There Is Any Form Of The State That Is Not Evil? Even The Nation-State With The Smallest Power Will Grow Stronger Every Day, Just As The U.S. Government Did, And In The End Dominate The Populous In The Manner Foretold By Orwell Or Demonstrated In The Communist Dictatorships Of The Past.

The State Is Your Enemy. The State Is The Eternal Enemy Of Mankind. Remember That Even When You Can See Through The Simple-Minded Lies Of The State It Is Still Winning If You Must Remain Silent About Those Lies. You Must Speak Out When And Where You Can.

Anarchy


All Modern Revolutions Have Ended In A Reinforcement Of The Power Of The State ~ Albert Camus

Engineers Vs. Thugs: The Power Of Bitcoin, Cryptography & Technology

Bitcoin Is An Idea

Bitcoin Is An Alternate Medium Of Exchange

Bitcoin Is A Source For Coders, Programmers And Engineers

Bitcoin Is A Political Statement To The Ever Expansive State And It’s Monopoly Of Control

Bitcoin Is Anarchist In It’s Own Decentralized Nature Allowing People To Realize Their Own Self Determination

Bitcoin Is A Challenge To The Central Banks Who Dominate The World With Their Printing Of Hyper Inflated Fiat Currencies


The Rothschilds, And That Class Of Money Lenders Of Whom They Are The Representatives And Agents Men Who Never Think Of Lending A Shilling To Their Next Door Neighbors, For Purposes Of Honest Industry, Unless Upon The Most Ample Security, And At The Highest Rate Of Interest Stand Ready, At All Times, To Lend Money In Unlimited Amounts To Those Robbers And Murderers, Who Call Themselves Governments, To Be Expended In Shooting Down Those Who Do Not Submit Quietly To Being Robbed And Enslaved. ~ Lysander Spooner

The ‘Nations,’ As They Are Called, With Whom Our Pretended Ambassadors, Secretaries, Presidents, And Senators Profess To Make Treaties, Are As Much Myths As Our Own. On General Principles Of Law And Reason, There Are No Such ‘Nations.’ … Our Pretended Treaties, Then, Being Made With No Legitimate Or Bona Fide Nations, Or Representatives Of Nations, And Being Made, On Our Part, By Persons Who Have No Legitimate Authority To Act For Us, Have Intrinsically No More Validity Than A Pretended Treaty Made By The Man In The Moon With The King Of The Pleiades. ~ Lysander Spooner

The Only Security Men Can Have For Their Political Liberty, Consists In Keeping Their Money In Their Own Pockets ~ Lysander Spooner

U No Use Linux????

Yo Uso Linux

What Is GNU/Linux?

GNU/Linux Is A Clone Of The Operating System Unix, Written From Scratch By Linus Torvalds With Assistance From A Loosely Knit Team Of Hackers Across The Net. It Aims Towards POSIX And Single UNIX Specification Compliance.

It Has All The Features You Would Expect In A Modern Fully Fledged Unix, Including True Multitasking, Virtual Memory, Shared Libraries, Demand Loading, Shared Copy On Write Executables, Proper Memory Management, And Multistack Networking Including IPv4 And IPv6.

Although Originally Developed First For 32-bit x86-based PCs (386 or higher), Today GNU/Linux Also Runs On A Multitude Of Other Processor Architectures, In Both 32 And 64 Bit Variants.

New To GNU/Linux?

If You’re New To GNU/Linux, You Don’t Want To Download The Kernel, Which Is Just A Component In A Working GNU/Linux System. Instead, You Want What Is Called A Distribution Of GNU/Linux, Which Is A Complete GNU/Linux System. There Are Numerous Distributions Available For Download On The Internet As Well As For Purchase From Various Vendors; Some Are General Purpose, And Some Are Optimized For Specific Uses.

Note, However, That Most Distributions Are Very Large (Several Gigabytes), So Unless You Have A Fast Internet Connection You May Want To Save Yourself Some Hassle And Purchase A CD/DVD ROM With A Distribution Pre Loaded; Such CD/DVD ROMs Are Available From A Number Of Vendors Wordwide.

GIFSec.com

 If You Want To Pay For It, That’s Up To You. But Most Distributions Are Free Open Source Software Or In Other Words It’s Free To Use. You Have The Option To Make A Voluntary Donation To A Specific Developer Or Developers Of The Distribution You Ultimately Choose To Use.

GIFSec.com

Just Remember One Thing If Decide To Make The Move Over To GNU/Linux, It’s Not Going To Be Easy Move At First, It Took Me About Two Years To Finally Grasp The Concept Of DIY Programming And Customization. Which Is Virtually Unheard Of With Windows Or Apple And Even If You Want To Customize Either Windows Or Apple, It’s Going To Cost You Big Money. Plus The Other Advantages Of GNU/Linux Is The Lack Of Spyware, Malware And Viruses. Because The GNU/Linux User Base Is So Small And The Code Variations Are Different Between Distributions. It’s Highly Unlikely You’ll Will Experience Problems Like Computer Viruses Or Malware With GNU/Linux Ever Again.
Arcane
You Can Change The Future By Using GNU/Linux
Download And Install A Distribution
 
FYI: Apple Actively Steals (A Violation Of The GNU General Public License) From The Core GNU/Linux Kernel Project To Develop Mac OSX And Then Cries Foul When An GNU/Linux Distro Looks Haunting Similar To Theirs.

Order Out Of Chaos: The Doctrine That Runs The World

Written By Brandon Smith | August 13th, 2014 | Alt-Market

“From The Days of Spartacus-Weishaupt To Those Of Karl Marx, And Down To Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), And Emma Goldman (United States), This World-Wide Conspiracy For The Overthrow Of Civilization And For The Reconstitution Of Society On The Basis Of Arrested Development, Of Envious Malevolence, And Impossible Equality, Has Been Steadily Growing. It Played, As A Modern Writer, Mrs. Webster, Has So Ably Shown, A Definitely Recognizable Part In The Tragedy Of The French Revolution. It Has Been The Mainspring Of Every Subversive Movement During The Nineteenth Century; And Now At Last This Band Of Extraordinary Personalities From The Underworld Of The Great Cities Of Europe And America Have Gripped The Russian People By The Hair Of Their Heads And Have Become Practically The Undisputed Masters Of That Enormous Empire.”

- Winston Churchill, February 1920, In An Article That Appeared In The Illustrated Sunday Herald

The concept of conspiracy frightens some people, so much so that they are willing to overlook any and all evidence that world events are for the most part directed, rather than chaotic and coincidental. For those who are uneducated and unaware, explanations for the terrible tides of politics and war generally revolve around a false understanding of Occam’s razor. They argue that the theory states that the “simplest explanation” is usually the correct one for any particular problem or crisis. But Occam’s razor actually states that the simplest explanation according to the evidence at hand is usually the correct answer for any given problem. That is to say, the simplest explanation must conform to the evidence, or it is likely not correct.

Unfortunately, “skeptics” of directed conspiracy often turn a blind eye to evidence that is contrary to their simple explanations, while arguing that simplification is its own vindication. In other words, they don’t feel the need to defend their simplistic world view because, in their minds, simplicity stands on its own as self-evident. There was a time when men believed that the planets revolved around each other because they were tied together by long glass strings, and this was evident to them because it was the simplest explanation they could come up with. The thinking of skeptics of the New World Order and concerted globalization is much like this.

The most common argument they tend to exploit is that the world is far too “chaotic” and that if the elites are actually seeking a fully centralized one-world system, they are “failing miserably” because so many cultures are so clearly divided. For anyone who holds this argument as logical or practical, first I would suggest they look beyond the surface of the various conflicts at the similarities between these so called “enemies.”

For example, what about the United States versus Russia? These two nations have a long history of opposing ideologies and have come close to war time and time again. Certainly, average Americans see themselves as individualists and Russians as socialist or communist. Average Russians see Americans as capitalist imperialists and see themselves as humanists. But what about their respective governments? What about their respective financiers and oligarchs? Do they really see each other as enemies?

If that were so, then why did American Wall Street tycoons and the U.S. military aid the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917?

A false paradigm was created when internationalists supported the Bolshevik Revolution and allowed Russia to become a communist-held country. The eventual Cold War that resulted created the rationale used by the military-industrial complex to build a massive standing army (which is not part of the U.S. Constitution), an army which could then be sent around the world to subdue various nations and even possibly be used to oppress the American people.

Even today, the false East/West paradigm continues, with America painted as the bumbling villain and Russia painted as the stalwart and reasonable objector. Yet Russia’s top government officials and our top government officials work closely with and answer to the same international financiers and elites, like the International Monetary Fund and the Bank of International Settlements, as I outlined in great detail in False East/West Paradigm Hides The Rise Of Global Currency and Russia Is Dominated By Global Banks, Too.

Even closer to current events, the U.S. has now entered into military operations against ISIS insurgents moving rapidly through Iraq’s northern regions toward Baghdad. However, if ISIS is the enemy, why did the U.S. and our ally, Saudi Arabia, support and train ISIS agents in Syria as well as Iraq?

Is it just irony that our government helped birth ISIS and now the White House is at war with the group? Or is it possible that maybe, just maybe, a greater plan is afoot?

As the sinister Rahm Emanuel famously said: “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that is an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before.”

If a crisis of opportunity does not present itself in the time frame you need, why not ENGINEER a crisis to fit your goals? This is a tactic that has been used by elites for generations, and it is called the Hegelian dialectic.

Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel’s work was the very foundation of the collectivist/socialist ideology, and it inspired Karl Marx during his writing of The Communist Manifesto. Hegel was an avid statist who believed that the collective must be ruled and directed by centralized governance and that all individualism should be sacrificed for the greater good.

Hegel wrote that the state “has supreme right against the individual, whose supreme duty is to be a member of the State… for the right of the world spirit is above all special privileges.”

In his dialectic theory, Hegel conjured a strategy by which the establishment elites could control the masses through deliberately created division. To define the Hegelian dialectic method simply, the ruling body must first trigger a problem or crisis that causes the citizenry to react with fear and demand a solution. The rulers then offer a solution, which they had already predetermined before they had started the crisis; this solution would usually entail more power for the elites and less freedom for the citizens.

The world appears divided and chaotic exactly because it has been MADE that way by a select few in the globalist establishment. In fact, if you were to name any war in the past 100 years, any competent alternative analyst would easily produce undeniable evidence of the involvement of international banks and think tanks pulling strings on both sides.

If you don’t understand the concept of “order out of chaos,” then you’ll never understand a thing.

Engineered Chaos Serves Several Purposes. It Provides Distraction And Cover For The Elites To Implement Other Plans That They Would Rather Not Have Noticed.

It also provides a scapegoat for the masses, who are now divided against each other. When violent changes are implemented that produce destructive consequences, the people must be placated with an easily identifiable villain. Certain changes globalists wish to make in the way the world functions require the careful exploitation of scapegoats.

For example, the globalists at the IMF have been discussing the establishment of a global basket currency for years to replace the U.S. dollar.

Russia and the East have also, conveniently, been calling for the IMF to replace the dollar with their Special Drawing Rights basket.

And finally, as well as conveniently, the elites in the U.S. government have launched a controlled coup in Ukraine and initiated direct economic confrontation with Russia, thereby giving the East the perfect excuse to dump the U.S. dollar as world reserve and replace it with a basket currency system under the IMF. Despite claims that Vladimir Putin is “anti-globalist,” the Russian is in fact an avid supporter of the IMF, and has stated his goal is to continue Russia’s IMF membership in a larger capacity:

“In The BRICS Case We See A Whole Set Of Coinciding Strategic Interests. First Of All, This Is The Common Intention To Reform The International Monetary And Financial System. In The Present Form It Is Unjust To The BRICS Countries And To New Economies In General. We Should Take A More Active Part In The IMF And The World Bank’s Decision-Making System. The International Monetary System Itself Depends A Lot On the US Dollar, Or, To Be Precise, On The Monetary And Financial Policy Of The US Authorities. The BRICS Countries Want To Change This.”

Yes, Vladimir, and so do the manipulative social engineers at the IMF…

Hopefully, you have the sense to see how this works: problem, reaction, solution. Economic or physical war is launched between East and West, while the dollar is killed in the process. The masses react by demanding a fair and balanced replacement for the dollar as world reserve so that economic stability can return. The Americans blame Russia and the East for their fiscal misfortune. The East blames the hubris of the West for its own downfall. Neither side blames the banksters, who started the whole calamity to begin with. And the elites swoop in as saviors with a new Bretton Woods-style agreement to appease all sides and cement their global currency system, the system they had always wanted. And with a global economic currency and authority in place, global governance is not far behind — order out of chaos.

This process is more psychological than political in its goals. One could argue that if the elites already have control of all central banks and governments, then why do they need a global government? The answer is that these men do not want secret global governance, they want open global governance. They want us to ACCEPT the idea as a fact of existence, for only when we agree to participate in the lie will they then have truly won.

The end result of World War I was the creation of the League of Nations and the argument that sovereignty leads to disunion and catastrophe. World War II led to the creation of the United Nations and the International Monetary Fund. I believe that a third world war is nearly upon us, one that may involve weapons of monetary destruction more so than weapons of mass destruction. Each supposed disintegration of global unity has eventually led to greater centralization, and this is something the skeptics seem to forget. The progression of crises suggests that the next war will lead to total globalization under the dominance of a minority of elitists posing as “wise men” who only wish to bring peace and harmony to the masses. In the meantime, the skeptics will continue to mindlessly debate in the face of all reason that the whole thing was a fluke, an act of random mathematical chance, leading coincidentally to the one thing the establishment rulers crave: total global totalitarian micromanagement.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Voluntary Donations To Alt-Market Can Be Made Below

http://www.alt-market.com/donate

 

The State is a monster

vigilantcanuck:

Voting Accomplishes Nothing, Fly The Black Flag And Don’t Look Back

Originally posted on On the Mark:

As I go through life, I continually meet people who are convinced that having a state (a monopoly government) in charge of everyone’s life is the only way that mankind can exist, or at least exist in a society. They agree with me that there are countless, literally countless, examples of the state, via its paid agents and minions, harming perfectly innocent people in various ways. I contend that the state is an attack on society and not the protector of society. I contend that the state is a monster.

Robert Higgs make makes a powerful argument for why the state is a monster:

Lest anyone protest that the state’s true “function” or “duty” or “end” is, as Locke, Madison, and countless others have argued, to protect individuals’ rights to life, liberty, and property, the evidence of history clearly shows that, as a rule, real states do not behave accordingly…

View original 814 more words

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 26 other followers

%d bloggers like this: